Little Blue Society

Civilized Solutions for a Civilized World
Home
Meet The Directors
Mission Statement
Our Approach
VEXING (ISI)
Land Services
Marine Services
Special Projects
CO2
Project Blue
Project Amazon
Sanctuary Project
Join and Donate
Testimonials
Pressroom
Giftshop
 

Banning Carbon Dioxide (CO2) To Kill Wildlife


Mephitis mephitis

Skunks are shallow breathers.  It takes over 20 agonizing minutes for a skunk to die in a CO2 gas chamber.


Because of the growing body of evidence in the published literature that exposure to carbon dioxide (CO2) causes more than momentary pain and distress in animals, and the first-hand experience of witnessing the suffering, and agonal vocalizations of animals undergoing death by CO2, Little Blue Society (LBS) STRONGLY OPPOSES the use of CO2 in all forms e.g. gas compressed in cylinders, and carbon dioxide gas generated by other methods such as from dry ice, fire extinguishers, or chemical means (i.e. antacids) to kill any animals.

After numerous complaints from the public about the Santa Clara County Vector Control's approach and methodology in dealing with coyotes and other so-called “nuisance” wildlife.  And learning that they used a metal gas chamber with industrial strength carbon dioxide gas to suffocate the animals, in April of 2005, Little Blue Society designed a program and submitted a proposal to the Vector Control Agency asking them to transition from carbon dioxide gas to the more humane lethal injection.

After a year of negotiations with the Agency and with the help of Supervisor Pete McHugh, the Vector Control Agency transitioned from using CO2 to the more humane lethal injection to dispatch "nuisance" wildlife.

This change went in to effect January 1, 2006.


OUR reasons for opposing CO2:

This includes compressed carbon dioxide (CO2) gas in cylinders and carbon dioxide generated by other methods such as from dry ice, fire extinguishers, or chemical means such as antacids.

1. The AVMA report provides information on CO2 use as a euthanasia agent, but its summary of the available literature is inadequate. It does not address some key issues raised by the literature or by differences in common laboratory practice, and its recommendations are vague at best.

2. The AVMA recommeded concentration and method of CO2 euthanasia does NOT meet it’s own standards for humane euthanasia:       

    a. euthanasia techniques should result in rapid unconsciousness
    b. followed by cardiac or respiratory arrest and ultimate loss of brain function.

In addition, the technique should minimize any stress and anxiety experienced by the animal prior to unconsciousness. 

The 1986 and 1993 AVMA reports on euthanasia cautioned against the use of decapitation because it was found that EEG activity continued for an average of 13.6 seconds in the decapitated heads.  With the AVMA recommended concentration and method of CO2 euthanasia, the time until unconsciousness ranged from 10 seconds to 4 minutes in published studies.  Therefore the potential for 13.6 seconds or more of stress or distress in CO2 euthanasia is high even by the AVMA’s own standards for euthanasia.

3.  CO2 has actually been used as a stimulus in studies that examine pain responses in animals (Barbaccia et al., 1996; Thurauf et al., 1991) as has been done in humans.

4. All mammals have chemical receptors in their lungs (intrapulmonary chemoreceptors, or IPCs) that are acutely sensitive to carbon dioxide.

In a seminar presented at the US Department of Agriculture on December 16, 2004, Dr. Mohan Raj, Senior Research Fellow in the Farm Animal Division of the School of Clinical Veterinary Science at the University of Bristol in England, described the effects of CO2  on the body. CO2 induces breathlessness – a subjective distress in breathing known as dyspnea. According to Dr. Raj, dyspnea in both birds and mammals “activates brain regions associated with pain and induces an emotional response of panic.”